Dumaguete Info Search


A MUST SEE INTERVIEW REGARDING **********!

Discussion in 'COVID-19' started by mangoman, Mar 24, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mangoman

    mangoman DI Junior Member Infamous

    Messages:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    35
    Ratings:
    +125 / 4
    Below are links to an interview of an expert who did an unbiased analysis of multiple studies done regarding the efficacy of ********** for prevention and treatment of Covid-19 disease.

    The expert began her research of the body of evidence from studies regarding the use ********** for treatment of Covid-19 unsure where it would lead, allowing the body of evidence presented in the data to form her conclusions and final opinion regarding **********.

    Her presentation of the facts in this interview helped me, and I'm sure you will help you to form a much more informed opinion regarding the use of ********** for the prevention and treatment of Covid-19 disease.

    THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW (WELL WORTH YOUR TIME):


    SUMMARY OF THE INTERVIEW (NICE SUMMARY FOR THOSE SHORT ON TIME):


    R&D WEBSITE FOR PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19
    https://covid19criticalcare.com/
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Rye83

    Rye83 with pastrami Admin Secured Account Highly Rated Poster SC Connoisseur Veteran Army

    Messages:
    13,106
    Trophy Points:
    451
    Occupation:
    FIRE
    Location:
    Valencia
    Ratings:
    +16,069 / 3,795
    Blood Type:
    O+
    From their About Us page:
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. Sojourner

    Sojourner DI New Member Infamous

    Messages:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    64
    Ratings:
    +10 / 5
    I looked up the protocol you are citing above... the "**********/Mask+ Protocol" and this protocol has nothing to do with the data gathered and analyzed by the expert in this interview.

    For those interested, the **********/Mask + Protocol (I-Mask+ Protocol) is an early outpatient treatment protocol for Covid-19.

    Below is a link below which outlines precisely what this protocol involves:

    https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/i-mask-plus-protocol/
     
  4. Rye83

    Rye83 with pastrami Admin Secured Account Highly Rated Poster SC Connoisseur Veteran Army

    Messages:
    13,106
    Trophy Points:
    451
    Occupation:
    FIRE
    Location:
    Valencia
    Ratings:
    +16,069 / 3,795
    Blood Type:
    O+
    The protocol which has not been proven to work, has not been peer reviewed, or shown to be better than placebo. These are not my words, it is theirs.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Notmyrealname

    Notmyrealname DI Forum Luminary Highly Rated Poster Showcase Reviewer

    Messages:
    4,920
    Trophy Points:
    386
    Ratings:
    +5,592 / 2,888
    Others here seem to think the 'expert' opinion of ONE person is enough for proof. It is interesting that one of those members wrote an extremely vitriolic post against me for having opinions as a virologist (a post so bad it was deleted (along with all replies to it), and members have been permanently banned from the Forum for FAR less). I also note the similarities between certain members in this pushing of ********** - doppelgangers or what? I think I know.
     
    • I was wondering about that too! I was wondering about that too! x 1
  6. Sojourner

    Sojourner DI New Member Infamous

    Messages:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    64
    Ratings:
    +10 / 5
    Like I said the protocol you find so important has nothing to do with the interview, which is the topic of the poster. If you watch the video, you will learn that.
     
  7. Rye83

    Rye83 with pastrami Admin Secured Account Highly Rated Poster SC Connoisseur Veteran Army

    Messages:
    13,106
    Trophy Points:
    451
    Occupation:
    FIRE
    Location:
    Valencia
    Ratings:
    +16,069 / 3,795
    Blood Type:
    O+
    I didn't post the original source and I don't find it important, far from it. The OP put it as a source in his topic, not me. I only posted the disclaimer from the source, nothing else. I think I saw the video in the link provided as well. The website makes it very clear that the content they provide should not be confused with or taken as medical advice and the information has not been peer reviewed. I will take their word on it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Sojourner

    Sojourner DI New Member Infamous

    Messages:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    64
    Ratings:
    +10 / 5
    The protocol which has not been proven to work, has not been peer reviewed, or shown to be better than placebo.”

    The PROTOCOL you cited in the legal disclaimer on the website, has not been studied worldwide and thus the need for the legal disclaimer. Additionally, the data studied by the expert in these videos has nothing do with this PROTOCOL and thus was not reviewed by the expert in the video.

    What the expert does discuss in the video, is that ********** (not the I-Mask Protocol) on average has proven in studies worldwide, to be on average 83 times more effective than placebo.

    Researchers noted in some studies, for obvious ethical reasons, that they ended the studies on ********** and allowed people in the placebo group to begin taking **********, because the drug had easily shown itself to be much more effective in clearing the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the group taking the **********, than those in the placebo group, and thus it was no longer ethical to continue the study, but rather to begin immediately giving those in the placebo group the **********, due to human compassion.

    That is powerful testimony from the actual researchers which should not be dismissed as meaningless. I'm certain if both you and I had both been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and were placed in a placebo group and were getting sicker and sicker and the study was stopped due to ethical and compassionate reasons and we were given ********** and it saved our lives... we would both have a different point of view today. But since this did not happen, it is easy for one of us being totally removed from what is documented to have happened to others, and to dig up a legal disclaimer on a website about a protocol not used in the studies being discussed in the videos and claim it as enough proof for ourselves that ********** works no better than a flour-filled placebo.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Rye83

    Rye83 with pastrami Admin Secured Account Highly Rated Poster SC Connoisseur Veteran Army

    Messages:
    13,106
    Trophy Points:
    451
    Occupation:
    FIRE
    Location:
    Valencia
    Ratings:
    +16,069 / 3,795
    Blood Type:
    O+
    Cool story. I am skeptical and think there could be something else going on (something that involves making tons of shady unethical money off of gullible people and trying to get people to question the scientific method). It stinks of conspiracy theory, IMO. Who is funding this research, these "informational" websites not linked to any university or government agency? If it is such a miracle treatment why hasn't it been approved for this use by governments around the world? It really feels like an extension of the antivax movement to me.

    It could very well be a valid treatment, I'm not convinced yet. Some videos from people I've never heard of giving "powerful testimony" (aka appeal to emotion) and information from websites that don't end in .edu or .gov with unknown financers and those websites that seem to promote "natural" treatments isn't enough to convince me. Let me know when government drug agencies around the world approve the drug for this use. Currently there is no oral or intravenous forms of the drug safe for human consumption available in this country so it currently doesn't really even matter if it is a valid treatment or not.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  10. Notmyrealname

    Notmyrealname DI Forum Luminary Highly Rated Poster Showcase Reviewer

    Messages:
    4,920
    Trophy Points:
    386
    Ratings:
    +5,592 / 2,888
    And why three (?) members here so very passionate about this one drug??? Never seen anything like it before.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...