The absurd meter just went up a notch. Page 5 section c of the Order. If you are between the ages of 21 and 59 but live with someone who is under 21 or over 60, then you are to stay at home too. I'm sort of guessing that no one should be allowed out. Like I have always said, the motto of It's More Fun in the Philippines, should have been The Philippines, You Have to See It To Believe It. I agree with Danbandanna, I will venture out. No more Q Passes.
You're misquoting. Probably makes a bit more sense if you quote it completely and correctly. Regardless of whether you agree with it or not.
No, what they are saying is if you live with someone who is at risk, they don't want them bringing it home to the 'at risk' person. Not misquoting, it is pretty obvious. Sorry if you disagree but it is what it is.
1. how do they know if someone lives with an "at risk" person 2. how will they contain this if there are no checkpoints 3. see items 1 and 2 will wait till Monday then I am out and about...cheers
Elephant in the room: Elderly people considering going back home permanently as soon as it is safe to travel because future recurrences are imminent and govt will not give a d*mn about them when it does. But it is too depressing to talk about elephants in the room. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk