That's the thing with the sanctions , it is all the innocent ones that become collateral damage on the way through , be alright if they could just make Putin ride a pushbike to work for 12 months , or cancel his hunting trips for a year etc. , probably have more effect.
What a disgrace , the phones of victims of the crash are being used and answered by people with eastern European accents , and now families are finding out that credit cards from the victims are being used as well , they need to be tracked down and punished , this is just terrible for the families to deal with on top of their already overwhelming grief , I am just disgusted and can only describe the perpetrators as robbers of every one else's oxygen . Link below , but beware it will make you angry. Credit cards stolen from MH17 victims, used in Ukraine
"They have no respect for each other, look what they're doing ... It's no surprise that they were treating the remains of people like that." And this guy thinks that this wouldn't happen anywhere else in the world? When I ran my website I had a couple Filipinos used the cards of deceased people to pay for product (and I'm pretty sure that one of them was a foreigner who died while in the Philippines). It happens all the time all over the world. The only thing that makes this different is that these people are on the news. It's sad but it's a fact of life....many people just don't give a crap about anyone but themselves. Closing up financial matters should be one of the first things a family does after the death of a loved one. Waiting weeks is irresponsible.
Yeah, this is a place which is an economic basket case. It's poor compared to Russia, which is itself a poor country. They are in the middle of a civil war, which must make a hard life even harder. Not to mention these guys have a horribly low life expectancy due to drinking. This is not a nice place to live right now. Historically, this place has been a nightmare. The Philippines is poor, Ukraine has been brutalized through history.
Add to the above that there now emerge pictures in which people (I'm not sure I'm using the correct verbage here) are actually using grinders on the remains of the Boeing, for whatever reason. How much lower can you sink?? Vicmico
You guys just don't get what grinding and relentless poverty is do you? You act like they are monsters when in reality, if most humans were put in their situation they would be doing the EXACT same thing. Lets look at it from their eyes: 1. Is a dead person in immediate need of their clothing/money/belongings? No. 2. Will those cloths/money/belongings help you survive? Yes. 3. Would selling the scrap metal help you survive the next couple weeks or months? Yes. 4. Can the feelings and closure of the deceased's family members feed your hunger and quench your thirst? No. 5. Would you care about the investigation of the crash from the countries that are mostly to blame for the conflict raging conflict in your region? No. First world problems that the poor simply don't have the luxury of giving a crap about. The West can b*tch and moan about it all they like, they are ultimately to blame for the war and the standard of living in the region.
Hard to accept what "Wrye" wrote but it is the reality the people live in, look at the lives of the people in war zones and our "civiliced" ways of life don't work no more... Just hope that you do not have to experience it ever yourself...
Having not lived in extreme poverty , or not lived in a war zone would admittedly make me ignorant to understand the dastardly behaviour of these debauchee's , when that plane went down in the Andes many years ago , I could understand what those guy's done to survive , because of the isolation and their predicament , but when I see well armed and clothed soldiers with communication and access to advanced weaponry I struggle with any justification on what they have done . "Taking items from the enemy which are not of intelligence or strategic value is considered looting. For example, if you were to take a weapon from a wounded or dead enemy soldier, then that could easily be seen as just securing the enemy and would be permissible. If you were to search him and take papers, documents, or anything else of an apparent strategic value, then that would be allowed as well. However, if you search him and find things like money, personal letters from home, pictures of his/her family, religious items, etc, then you must leave those with the enemy. Those provide no apparent strategic value to you and therefore should be left alone. Illegal under Art 132, LOAC, and Articles of the Geneva Convention: The treatment of the battlefield dead can be divided into two aspects. First, there is a prohibition on deliberate mistreatment of the body, either through failure to treat it with appropriate respect or through mutilation. Second, there is a prohibition on pillaging the dead. These mandates concerning the dead are as much derived from the customary laws of war as from the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions take the customary rules further. In Article 16 of the First Geneva Convention, we find an obligation for the party that has the body to send to the other party (usually through a neutral power or the ICRC) written evidence of death. Where the body is identified with the required double identity disk, one half of the disk, along with any personal effects found on the body, is to be sent to the other side." We are all going to have our own opinion on right and wrong , acceptable behaviour , or even being able to understand certain behaviour , my opinion is that after shooting down and killing 300 innocent people , to then go and loot their posessions displays a total lack of empathy and morals , and even people that live in poverty need empathy and morals , otherwise , with out it ,we as a human race are f*cked. Just my personal opinion. Tony Everything between " and that " is a cut and paste on what the Human race is meant to do, even in war let alone when dealing with innocent non combatants that are victims
Hmm...so when did the Geneva conventions apply to "irregular combatants" (the rebels)? What country are they serving under that is a signatory? Also, the Geneva Convention was written for soldiers, not civilians. That rule about bodies does not apply to civilian corpses.