So you and I and all those who rated my post positively are in full agreement.
But now you say people who think like that have closed minds, are immature and are "sanctimonious and hypocritical". So:
1. You have labelled yourself in that way also as you just said you agree with us.
2. What meaning do you attach to the word 'sanctimonious'? 'Acting as if morally better than others'? If that is the case then, I agree, we are morally better than "scum foreigners who falsely promise a better life etc in order to get laid and disappear" (YOUR words) - and therefore so must you be as you said they make you sick. Or are you saying those who defend higher moral values in society are 'acting'? And how would you know that we are 'acting' if you are not aware of how we behave in our lives?
3. I thought 'hypocritical' was already included within the definition of 'sanctimonious'.
Best Posts in Thread: Yada Yada / The Off Topic Arena
Page 5 of 26
-
Notmyrealname DI Forum Luminary Highly Rated Poster Showcase Reviewer
-
Some fair points have been made on this post. I think most girls here agreeing to become a partner of an older foreigner to help provide for their families and themselves are knowingly making tremendous sacrifices. Even if there is a marriage their families will be always be number one. If they are treated respectfully, you may be fortunate enough to gain their affection over time. Be honest and trustworthy and they may be as well.
-
Agree x 3
-
Like x 1
-
-
Here is the forum staff list for future reference:
https://dumagueteinfo.com/board/members/?type=staff
I think everyone should get off his @ss now that he has l taken some lashings, has refrained from snapping back at the snide comments obviously directed at him and is making far more useful/positive posts now.
That being said, I won't delete the thread in question, I think it serves as a reminder and warning that it is generally not welcome here and will be met with hostility by the admin, moderators and possibly users. If he can convince another admin or moderator to take action and remove it then more power to him.-
Like x 2
-
Agree x 2
-
-
Notmyrealname DI Forum Luminary Highly Rated Poster Showcase Reviewer
-
Agree x 4
-
-
Here is what I asked in the thread you are getting this idea from:
Your reply of;
-
Like x 4
-
-
A better option is to request someone send you a private message.-
Like x 2
-
Informative x 2
-
-
jimeve DI Forum Luminary Highly Rated Poster Showcase Reviewer Veteran Army
- Messages:
- 3,536
- Trophy Points:
- 401
- Occupation:
- retired.
- Location:
- Philippines.
- Ratings:
- +1,889 / 1,035
- Blood Type:
- A+
-
Off-topic (since we are in the off-topic thread): I would also like a side conversation (or off-topic thread within a thread) option that throws an expandable smaller sub-thread/reply chain under posts so that users can stay in the same thread while going off-topic while not bothering other users. Kinda how Reddit does it. That sh*t forum software I tried before this one had that feature...unfortunately the rest of the software was (and still is) complete sh*t. It is certainly doable on this software....but by someone much better at coding than I am.
I think that 25 posts to leave a disagree might not be enough. Might raise it to 100-200 posts. We'll see. Since only the OP of a thread can receive one it might not even be worth the extra effort.-
Like x 4
-
-
Brian Oinks That's Mr. Pig to you Boy! :) Highly Rated Poster
lol no worries mate we all hiccup from time to time
Hope you're on the mend soon
-
Like x 3
-
Thanks x 1
-
Page 5 of 26